I had an opinion
I worry that I made the article toothless as a result. I probably shouldn�t have even bothered to be considerate, because no matter what I did someone would take it the wrong way. I already got one e-mail, which was very polite, taking issue that I speculated that the person who did it was drunk at the time. He was speaking on behalf of drunk people on campus, I suppose, and he said that I was driving a further wedge between the drinkers and nondrinkers on campus to suggest that drunk people did stupid things. I should have modified that to say �drunk assholes�, since I agree that drinking simply frees one of inhibitions and gives some people excuses to do things they have always wanted to do. Mike has a good opinion piece about it here. But what really chilled me was the e-mail I heard about someone send to the Collegian complaining about my article and that �people like me� shouldn�t be allowed to have a voice in a college paper. And there are no papers today in Peirce, which is odd, because usually a big pile of extras stays there for a few days. Robbie suggested that maybe someone took them because they didn�t like what was in this week�s issue (this year we�ve had a problem with people burning the newspaper and the conservative magazine).
�Wait a minute. Don�t tell me this. Don�t tell me someone BURNED the papers with my article on flag burning in it.� Completely ridiculous. It�s only a few people, and most people on this campus aren�t raging assholes, but the ones who are make me so ready to get out of here.